Відео

You are right, Dr. Cole also mentions US doctors and the fact that overall there are bad doctors in our other videos, this video focuses on medical tourism abroad

they are available by prescription only, you are welcome to contact our clinic or ask your local pharmacy if they have it or can make it for you.

Please contact the clinic, we have solutions but we need you to provide photos first to evaluate: www.forhair.com/free-online-consultation/

Yeah he came a long way from his 1st surgery, this time just a touch-up on the left hairline and beard, he has very good density and plenty left in his donor area so why not :)

We are regenerating significant portion of the donor area that is extracted. The hair that was not there before, but is apparent now is a result of transition telogen to anagen. A donor area can have 30% of the hair in the telogen phase which is dormant. If you were to turn all that hair back onto anagen, there would be a significant increase in density.

@@forhair ... "If you were to turn all that hair back onto anagen" ... key word "if" . How are you regenerating hair that was not there before??? All the research and videos I've been watching are telling me that once the hair is gone... it's gone for good.

If you like how Andrew's hair turned out, be sure to smash the like button.

There isn't a one size fits all punch for hairline correction. If you have larger grafts placed along the front, you need a bigger punch and vice versa. The worst thing you can do is transect a graft you are trying to remove along the frontal hairline as it could end up buried and grow out worse than it started. Any physician that claims to only use one specific size punch is a moron and has not business performing hair restoration surgery. Our punch sizes range from .6mm-1.1mm. Look at coleinstruments.com Also note that our punches are true to size. Every other company that manufactures punches may claim to offer a .8mm. However, when we do a tricometer test on these companies punches, they are .2mm larger than what they advertise them being.

We are not recommending other clinics on this channel, Take your time and do your research

Fr😭😭😭

GET OUT!

if you stop them your DHT levels return to their normal state after 7 days and you will be back to your usual rate of hair loss before you started the medication, meaning you will probably lose the hair density you gained and might lose more existing hairs

@@forhair so basically you’re committed for life to these two products?

@@Claybraham91 yep, either one. hair loss is progressive and something you need to treat until you don't care anymore if it ever happens, hair restoration is a good solution too, some do hair transplants and leave it without treatment in hope hair loss will not progress but the safe route is to take it as long you want to keep your hair

It is a good idea if the physicians would listen. Unfortunately, the equipment used to make this possible is expensive. Presenting this information would only open up an avenue for physician's to exploit patients and offer an inferior product. This would dilute patient confidence and only serve to hurt the consumer. Take PRP as an example, just about every physician offers PRP, but they purchase the cheapest devices and kits to process the blood. They often have no idea of the cell concentration they are injecting and usually do not produce a result. Today many patients that undergo PRP are skeptical because they hear all the bad reviews and lack of results from the industry. Though we have put on regenerative conferences in the past, few physicians wish to be apart of it though, it is the future of medicine in general. Take FUE as an example. This technique became available to physicians in 2004. It was hard pressed as the future of hair restoration surgery. It took over a decade for FUE to become popular and realized as the gold standard for hair restoration surgery today.

@@forhair Yeah, that makes sense, but I think if you are truly able to get at least 30% regeneration and demonstrate it with adequate evidence, physicians would be willing to invest in it. The donor zone is otherwise a finite resource and people spend tens if not 100k+ on a transplant.if they're an advanced NW, so there clearly is demand. With even 30% regeneration, that basically means any patient without something like DUPA is cured.

@@jeremyliak3480 We have been using a protocol since 2008 for donor regeneration that was enabling 30-60% follicle regeneration. It is not just the stem cells that is enabling regeneration but the procedure as a whole. In order to achieve this, exstractions must be minimal in circumference. They also need to be shallower. This will leave behind more tissue to enable regeneration. To do this you need tools designed for hair restoration. Unfortuntely many colleagues in the industry prefer to use adaptations of dental tools to perform the procedure. The devices are able to get grafts out, but they prevent any possibility of follicle regeneration. The less invasive the procedure, the greater the success rate is in terms of regeneration. Our new protocol now uses a mulitiude of growth factors. While I cannot speak on percentages at this time without more data, the results that have trickled in are better than what they were before.

We don't have any experience with them, we formulate our own topical solutions

Hair will begin to grow at three months. You then have to wait for the hair to elongate. The transition is gradual and normal not to see noticeable regrowth until the 6 month mark.

Lipoderm

@@forhair why?

No, we are not able to achieve 100% regeneration. Our previous protocol took years to gather enough data to confirm 30-60% regeneration. Our new protocol is generating more regrowth, but we can't come out with a new bold numbers until the pool is expanded. The are evident extraction sites in the video where new follicles are not growing in. Another important factor to consider is much of the hair in the donor area wasn't visible prior to the procedure because they had cycled out and a new hair needed to populate. Our protocol stimulated those hairs into anagen. Hair that remains in the anagen phase will not shed. While it does require continued maintenance to prevent hair from cycling, continued treatments will prevent the need for a future hair transplant.

Possibly more than just one case, as doctor said he’s working on this for looong time.. lets see 🤞

Images were provided. There is a tattoo in the donor area to map the same location everytime. There are images before the procedure, immediately post op, and after regrowth. Even if you didn't believe the tattoo was in the same location. Compare the scars in the donor region to the result photos. There is clear pigmentation difference in some of the extraction sites. Though I understand a concern where you can find all the exstraction sites as the protocol does reduce scarring. The only way to improve on these images is to create a google earth scalp imaging layout to allow you to walk around the entire scalp.

More cases will be produced. Please note that many are reluctant to be in the study as you have to shave the donor area every time to be precise.

Brother, I have been researching hair loss for 27 years and I promise you that he’s not a scammer. He’s actually one of the best in the industry and has proven himself with not only the art of natural looking hair lines with minimal hair extraction being the best, but also tools. Anyone who knows about hair loss and or it’s problems that come with it knows Dr Cole is top of the line. Period!!!

The channel does not have a huge following. These are not claims. Pause the images. You can see the exact location of the tattoo. You can match the scars with the extraction sites, and you will see more hair in the donor area than was there prior to the procedure. This is factual evidence. You are one of the lucky few to see this result as information regarding cell based therapy is suppressed.

When Will the study that dr.cole did , be published?

@@Andy-oy7st Dr. Cole already published an article back in 2017, I will search for the link...he is working on a more updated study as we speak :)

@@Andy-oy7st here: www.amazon.com/Cutting-Edge-Therapies-Follicular-Transplantations-ebook/dp/B01NCZTYSW

Attempting to laser the hair off usually does not work. It will also make the removal process more difficult. You are better off removing with FUE than attempting the laser.

@@forhair Thank you for the detailed explanation. I have just one more question: when hair transplants from the hairline are removed with FUE, what percentage of them can be reused?

@@user-ib1ue2yk1j This is an excellent question. My first question to anyone looking to remove grafts is to understand their long-term goals. Do they want to remove everything and be naturally bald, do they want to have more hair and appear natural, or do they just want to remove the most apparent grafts? Removal of grafts is tricky and similar to changing money in a foreign country. When you give them $1, you do not receive $1 dollar's worth of foreign currency. You will receive less. You always lose something when you relocate grafts, as well. For this reason, I would like to know the goals. Most want to look natural and have more hair. In this instance, I remove only what I need to create a natural hairline. Because grafts from most clinics are not appropriately placed, the angle of orientation in the skin is guesswork. This means that some grafts will be destroyed upon removal. The goal is always to minimize the destruction of the hair in a graft, but we will eliminate some of the grafts. When the grafts are taken out intact, the survival rate is outstanding. When the graft is destroyed, the yield will be zero. So, we would like to remove only what needs to be removed and leave behind anything we do not need to remove. However, I can generally remove 90 to 99% of the grafts intact. One of the things I find from most doctors is that they do not get the grafts out intact, and they don't see and dig out the grafts they bisect. Repairing these repair cases is even more complex because they changed the exit angle and left scars to contend with.

Electrolysis does not work either

The removal process is not scarless, but the scarring is minimal and often require magnification to see. Another concern is pitting as a result from the prior bad hair transplant. Removal may not resolve the pitting issue. Though the reason this area heals so well is there is more blood flow to the front of the scalp than the donor area which reduces scarring.

There are a few prinicples at play here. First, the size of the wound is smaller than 1.5 mm so the scarring will be minimal. The second is that the hairline region heals better than the back of someone's head so scarring on the hairline and the beard area are minimal. This principle is also why hairline advancement procedures heal well, but it's not a good idea in people (males in particular) with hairloss. There will be a scar in the males so stick to FUEing the grafts out when possible. Another reason is the punches I make for myself make smaller wounds and follow langer's lines.

Thanks!

It would be easier to apply both treatments at the same time. The end result won't vary if you apply one first followed by another later.

between three and six weeks

Dr. Cole is working with ACell since 2014.

yes. you should first check if there are other reasons for your diffused thinning (ie: thyroid, hormones etc,,,)

The video has not been made public yet. It will be made public later today. You have early access since you are part of the Forhair newsletter.

You are not the first person I've seen so focused on their hair. Be careful with the kenalog because it can shut down your adrenal glands. Monitor your cortisol levels. The estrogen can effectively chemically castrate you and protect your hair. You might also look at bicalutamide. Could you keep me posted on your progress? You are correct that as long as you have active hair follicles, you have a shot at re-growing them.

@@editorfuemagazine2751 Thanks for the tips! How should I contact you to keep you informed of my progress?

5mg of fin/min ? that's' a bit overkill right those are the prescribed doses for other medical issues

@@itschasezilla ​ @chasejoseph Actually, you're right about that. However people my age, 40+, need a higher dose of finasteride, 2.5 to 5 mg to be effective, based on my reading. I'm doing 150 mg a day of oral spironolactone and seem to be fine. It's helping me be more regular too so that's a plus as I'm trying to lose a few pounds.

The protocl we have has improved. This protocol looks in the Acell preventing it from seeping out which will improve the result. Also, are able to minimize scarring with our Zero T punch and should have a video coming out on the wound size. Lastly, our incisions are at a shallower depth which mitigates scarring. This combination of factors is a less invasive procedure, but anytime the body is penetrated to create a wound a scar is left behind.

I was literally wondering the same cuz it seems like you'd get hairy hands from this

Have been using everyday for the past 5 years without gloves. Yet to developement any new hair on my fingertips or knuckles.

@@forhairdoes it work???

@@TC-do4qmwhat do you mean?

regenera by hims?

@@forhair No was done in my home country UAE i talk in general

you commented on a different video in which you applied "regenera" , it is a different product, that we don't use when we say "regenerative medicine" it means a variety of products like CRP, exosomes, stem cell therapy etc...

There are many medications out there to combat hair. You may want to consider a genetic test to see what you respond best to. Name brand is a better product than generic. We do tend to see better results from topical treatments, but not everyone has the receptors to dissolve certain medications. All these treatments are designed to slow down hair loss, but they will not stop it. You could also try mesotherapy in conjunction with take home medical therapy to enhance the results.

Try going as low as .5 % finasteride with 3% minoxidil. There is still a risk of systemic side effects. Other than the loss of morning wood, are you still able to get it up if you try? Regarding joint pain, the is the first reported case I have come across. Have you changed anything else in your daily routine?

@@forhair thanks for your kind reply. Actually loss of morning wood has been a major concern for me. However, I’m not 100 sure if it’s nocebo effect, especially with my bad experience with oral propecia years back. I can still get erection from time to time but libido is low, again I’m not sure if it’s only in my mind. That’s why I keep using it hoping that my mind clears up. Yes, I do not believe that propecia causes this joint pain. However, I was concerned coz this pain (which I never had) started less than two weeks after starting the topical formula. Before starting the topical one 1.5 month ago I was using nutrafol supplement for 1 year (it has multivitamins and collagen). I stopped it just right before I started the topical finasteride, not sure if this caused a drop in collagen, vit D, etc that affected my joints, or something else….

@@user-pz8vo7wh6l I don't react well with Minoxidil and I use the 2.5% Xyon. Try applying it every 3 days to give your body a chance to clear some this will still allow your hair to be saved and not overloading your body. This is especially important while your body adapts.

Try going as low as .5 % finasteride with 3% minoxidil. There is still a risk of systemic side effects. Other than the loss of morning wood, are you still able to get it up if you try? In regards to joint pain, the is the first reported case that I have come across. Have you changed anything else in your daily routine?

I could only tolerate 0,15 mg topical finasteride.

@@henrikg7661 0.15 mg or 0.15 % ?! Any benefit for the hair at this strength ?!

@@user-pz8vo7wh6l 0,15 mg. Too early to see the effect yet.

@@henrikg7661 better then nothing if you want to keep your hair :) or try to switch to dutasteride